Article 59 of the Saudi Law of the Judiciary
المادة 59 من نظام القضاء
The article makes the disciplining of judges the jurisdiction of a circuit in the Supreme Judicial Council of three of its full-time judge members, whose decisions are issued by majority and are not final until the Council approves.
Official text (Arabic)
This article has not been amended since the law was issued.
يكون تأديب القضاة من اختصاص دائرة تشكل في المجلس الأعلى للقضاء من ثلاثة من القضاة أعضاء المجلس المتفرغين، وتصدر قراراتها بالأغلبية، ولا تكون نهائية إلا بعد موافقة المجلس عليها.
This is the official Arabic wording, the only legally binding version. We do not translate the law itself; the explanation below is ours. Official source: Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers
Article 59 explained in plain English
This article sets out the body competent to discipline judges and how its decisions are issued.
The competent body: a circuit formed in the Supreme Judicial Council, made up of three of the full-time judges who are members of the Council. That discipline is in the hands of judges who are members of the Council is consistent with the independence of judges that Article 1 provides.
How decisions are issued:
- The circuit's decisions are issued by majority.
- Its decisions are not final until the Supreme Judicial Council approves them.
This means that a decision of the disciplinary circuit passes through two stages: it is issued by the circuit by majority, then approved by the Council so that it becomes final.
Its connection to neighboring articles:
- Article 58 provides that a judge whose violation is repeated or continues after the court's president has warned him is tried on disciplinary grounds, and this trial takes place before the circuit that Article 59 creates.
- Article 60 regulates the filing of the disciplinary case before the disciplinary circuit: it is filed by the head of the judicial inspection department or his delegate at the request of the president of the Supreme Judicial Council, either on his own initiative or on the proposal of the president of the court to which the judge belongs, and the request is submitted only on the basis of a criminal or administrative investigation conducted by a judge whose grade is not lower than appeal judge.
Practical example
A disciplinary case is filed against a judge at a court in Riyadh. The case is heard by the disciplinary circuit made up of three of the full-time judges who are members of the Supreme Judicial Council. If it issues its decision by majority, it does not become final until the Supreme Judicial Council approves it.
Translated from our Arabic explanation with machine assistance. For guidance only; it does not replace advice from a lawyer on your situation.
How we write and review contentA question about Article 59 of Law of the Judiciary?
Describe what happened and specialist lawyers answer. You can write in English.
- Completely free
- Lawyers from the directory answer
- Your name stays hidden
General Practice lawyers: ask a specialist about your case
Describe your situation briefly and we'll suggest a lawyer who specialises in this law
General Practice lawyers
Lawyers who handle this kind of case
Ali Al-Rubaie Law Office
Khalid Abdulrahman Al-Hajlah Law and Arbitration Office
Frequently asked questions about Article 59 of the Saudi Law of the Judiciary
Who has jurisdiction to discipline judges in Saudi Arabia?
A circuit formed in the Supreme Judicial Council of three of the full-time judges who are members of the Council.
How are the decisions of the judges' disciplinary circuit issued?
By majority, and they are not final until the Supreme Judicial Council approves them.
Is a disciplinary circuit decision final as soon as it is issued?
No. It is not final until the Supreme Judicial Council approves it.
More articles on Judicial Discipline and Trial of Judges
- Article 4
Judges may not be sued over their official acts except under the conditions and rules for their discipline, without prejudice to Article 68.
مع عدم الإخلال بحكم المادة الثامنة والستين من هذا النظام، لا تجوز مخاصمة القضاة - بسبب أعمال وظيفتهم - إلا وفق الشروط والقواعد الخاصة بتأديبهم.
- Article 58
The article gives the president of each court the right to supervise its judges and to warn them of their violations after hearing their statements, and lets a judge object to a written warning within fifteen days.
مع عدم الإخلال بما للقضاء من حياد واستقلال، وبما للمجلس الأعلى للقضاء من حق الإشراف على المحاكم والقضاة وأعمالهم، يكون لرئيس كل محكمة حق الإشراف على قضاتها وحق
- Article 60
The article regulates filing the disciplinary case against a judge by the head of the judicial inspection department at the request of the president of the Supreme Judicial Council, after a criminal or administrative investigation, and the contents of the statement of claim.
يرفع رئيس إدارة التفتيش القضائي أو من ينيبه الدعوة التأديبية ـ أمام دائرة التأديب ـ بطلب من رئيس المجلس الأعلى للقضاء إما من تلقاء نفسه أو بناء على اقتراح رئيس
- Article 61
The article provides that if the disciplinary circuit sees grounds to proceed with the case, the judge is summoned to appear at a suitable time, with a sufficient statement of its subject and the evidence of the violation.
إذا رأت دائرة التأديب وجهًا للسير في إجراءات الدعوى عن جميع المخالفات أو بعضها، كلف القاضي، بالحضور في ميعاد مناسب، ويجب أن يشتمل التكليف بالحضور على بيان كاف ب
- Article 62
The article allows the disciplinary circuit, on deciding to proceed with the case and with the Supreme Judicial Council's approval, to suspend the judge from work until the trial ends, and to reconsider the suspension.
يجوز لدائرة التأديب ــ عند تقرير السير في إجراءات الدعوى ـ وبعد موافقة المجلس الأعلى للقضاء أن تأمر بوقف القاضي عن مباشرة أعمال وظيفته حتى تنتهي المحاكمة وللدائ
- Article 63
The article provides that the disciplinary case against a judge lapses on his resignation, and that the disciplinary case does not affect the criminal or civil case arising from the same incident.
تنقضي الدعوى التأديبية باستقالة القاضي، ولا تأثير للدعوى التأديبية على الدعوى الجزائية أو المدنية الناشئة عن الواقعة نفسها.
The texts are reproduced from the official website of the Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers for reference; where they differ, the officially published Arabic text prevails. This content is not legal advice.

