Article 17 of the Saudi Copyright Law
المادة 17 من نظام حماية حقوق المؤلف
The article bars publishing, displaying or distributing a photograph without the permission of those photographed or their heirs except in specified cases, and gives an author alone the right to publish his letters, with the recipient's permission if publication would harm him.
Official text (Arabic)
This article has not been amended since the law was issued.
1- لا يحق لمن قام بإنتاج صورة أن ينشر أو يعرض أو يوزع أصل الصورة، أو نسخًا منها دون إذن الأشخاص الذين قام بتصويرهم، أو إذن ورثتهم، ولا يسري هذا الحكم إذا كان نشر تلك الصورة قد تم بمناسبة حوادث وقعت علنًا، أو تعلقت بموظفين رسميين، أو أشخاص ذوي شهرة عامة، أو سمحت بها السلطات العامة خدمة للصالح العام، وللشخص الذي تمثله الصورة أن يأذن بنشرها في الصحف، والمجلات، وغيرها من النشرات المماثلة حتى ولو لم يأذن بذلك المصور، وتسري هذه الأحكام على الصورة أيًّا كانت الطريقة التي عملت بها.
2- للمؤلف وحده الحق في نشر رسائله، ويشترط لممارسة هذا الحق الحصول على إذن المرسل إليه إذا كان من شأن هذا النشر أن يلحق به ضررًا.
This is the official Arabic wording, the only legally binding version. We do not translate the law itself; the explanation below is ours. Official source: Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers
Article 17 explained in plain English
This article places restrictions on exploiting two kinds of works that relate to the privacy of others: personal photographs and letters.
First: photographs.
- A person who produced a photograph may not publish, display or distribute the original or copies of it without the permission of the persons he photographed or their heirs. The photographer, although he is the author of the photograph, does not alone decide to publish photographs of others.
- This prohibition does not apply if publication is on the occasion of events that took place publicly, or relates to public officials or persons of public fame, or is permitted by the public authorities in the service of the public interest.
- The person represented in the photograph may permit its publication in newspapers, magazines and similar publications even if the photographer has not permitted it.
- These provisions apply to the photograph however it was made, whether by camera, phone or otherwise.
Second: letters. The author alone has the right to publish his letters, and exercising this right requires the permission of the recipient if publication would harm him.
This article is a restriction on the author's rights to exploit his work, since it balances the right of the photographer or letter writer against the rights of others in their images and privacy. A person whose photograph was published without his permission may consult a lawyer who specializes in intellectual property and copyright to learn his rights.
Practical example
A studio in Al Khobar photographed a wedding, then published the couple's photos on its social media account for advertising without their permission. This violates the article, because the photographer may not publish the photograph without the permission of those photographed, and a private ceremony is not one of the excepted cases.
Translated from our Arabic explanation with machine assistance. For guidance only; it does not replace advice from a lawyer on your situation.
How we write and review contentA question about Article 17 of Copyright Law?
Describe what happened and specialist lawyers answer. You can write in English.
- Completely free
- Lawyers from the directory answer
- Your name stays hidden
Civil Litigation & Compensation lawyers: ask a specialist about your case
Describe your situation briefly and we'll suggest a lawyer who specialises in this law
Civil Litigation & Compensation lawyers
Lawyers who handle this kind of case
Dr. Ali Al-Rubaie Law Office and Ittihad Al-Asr Legal Company
Active contributorUnwan Law Firm
Frequently asked questions about Article 17 of the Saudi Copyright Law
May a photographer publish my photos without my permission?
No. A person who produced a photograph may not publish, display or distribute it without the permission of those he photographed or their heirs, except in the excepted cases.
When may a person's photograph be published without his permission?
If publication is on the occasion of events that took place publicly, or relates to public officials or persons of public fame, or is permitted by the public authorities in the service of the public interest.
May I publish letters someone else sent me?
The author alone has the right to publish his letters, and the recipient's permission is required if publication would harm him.
Does the rule apply to photos taken with a phone?
Yes. These provisions apply to the photograph however it was made.
More articles on Lawful Use of a Work without Permission
- Article 4
The article excludes from the law's protection laws, judgments and official documents and their official translations, daily news, and mere ideas, procedures, principles and facts.
لا تشمل الحماية المقررة بمقتضى هذا النظام: 1 - الأنظمة والأحكام القضائية ، وقرارات الهيئات الإدارية ، والاتفاقيات الدولية، وسائر الوثائق الرسمية، وكذلك الترجمات
- Article 15
The article lists lawful uses of a protected work without the right holders' consent, such as personal copying, quotation, teaching, news reporting and a backup copy of software, with specific conditions for each case.
تعد أوجه الاستخدام الآتية للمصنف المحمي بلغته الأصلية، أو بعد الترجمة مشروعة، وذلك دون الحصول على موافقة أصحاب حقوق المؤلف، وهذه الأوجه هي : 1 - نسخ المصنف للاس
- Article 16
The article allows the Minister to grant a compulsory license to publish a work in the public interest in specified cases, ending when the right holder publishes it, with a financial reward set by the Minister that can be challenged before the Board of Grievances.
1 - يجوز للوزير منح ترخيص نشر للمصنف بعد مضي مدة تحددها اللائحة التنفيذية لكل حالة، إذا رأى أن المصلحة العامة تقتضي نشر هذا المصنف، وذلك في الحالات الآتية : أ -
The texts are reproduced from the official website of the Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers for reference; where they differ, the officially published Arabic text prevails. This content is not legal advice.

