Skip to content

Article 31 of the Saudi Companies Law

المادة 31 من نظام الشركات · الفصل الثالث: إدارة الشركة

Article 31 deems a manager or board member to have performed their duty in good faith in a decision if three conditions are met, and places the burden of proving otherwise on the claimant.

Official text (Arabic)

This article has not been amended since the law was issued.

يعد مدير الشركة أو عضو مجلس إدارتها قد أدى واجبه في القرار الذي اتخذه أو صوت عليه بحسن نية، في حال تحقق الآتي:

أ- إذا لم يكن له مصلحة في موضوع القرار.

ب- إذا أحاط وألم بموضوع القرار إلى الحد المناسب في الظروف المحيطة وفق اعتقاده المعقول.

ج- إذا اعتقد جازمًا وبعقلانية أن القرار يحقق مصالح الشركة.

ويقع عبء إثبات خلاف ذلك على المدعي. ويقصد بالقرار لأغراض هذه المادة التصرف أو عدم التصرف في أمر يتعلق بأعمال الشركة.

This is the official Arabic wording, the only legally binding version. We do not translate the law itself; the explanation below is ours. Official source: Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers

Article 31 explained in plain English

Practical example

Translated from our Arabic explanation with machine assistance. For guidance only; it does not replace advice from a lawyer on your situation.

How we write and review content

A question about Article 31 of Companies Law?

Describe what happened and specialist lawyers answer. You can write in English.

  • Completely free
  • Lawyers from the directory answer
  • Your name stays hidden
Ask a lawyer for free

Commercial & Corporate Law lawyers: ask a specialist about your case

Describe your situation briefly and we'll suggest a lawyer who specialises in this law

Commercial & Corporate Law lawyers

Lawyers who handle this kind of case

See all lawyers

Frequently asked questions about Article 31 of the Saudi Companies Law

Is a company manager liable if the company loses money because of their decision?

The article deems the manager to have performed their duty in good faith if they had no interest in the decision, informed themselves of its subject to the appropriate extent, and firmly and rationally believed it served the company's interest; the claimant must prove otherwise.

Who bears the burden of proof in an action over a manager's decision?

The burden of proving that the conditions were not met falls on the claimant, according to the article.

Does a decision include a manager's refraining from acting?

Yes. The article means by a decision acting or not acting on a matter relating to the company's business.

More articles on Company Management and Managers' Liability

The texts are reproduced from the official website of the Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers for reference; where they differ, the officially published Arabic text prevails. This content is not legal advice.