Article 7 of the Saudi Employee Discipline Law
المادة 7 من نظام الانضباط الوظيفي
The article relieves the employee of the penalty if it is proved that he committed the violation in executing his superior's order despite alerting his superior to it in writing or by any means recognized by law.
Official text (Arabic)
This article has not been amended since the law was issued.
يعفى الموظف من الجزاء إذا ثبت أن ارتكابه المخالفة كان تنفيذًا لأمر صدر من رئيسه، بالرغم من تنبيه الموظف لرئيسه بالمخالفة كتابة أو بأي من الطرق المعتبرة نظامًا.
This is the official Arabic wording, the only legally binding version. We do not translate the law itself; the explanation below is ours. Official source: Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers
Article 7 explained in plain English
This article addresses a common situation: an employee receives an order from his superior that he considers contrary to the rules. It provides that the employee is relieved of the penalty if two things are proved together:
- That his committing the violation was in executing an order issued by his superior.
- That the employee alerted his superior to the violation before carrying it out, either in writing or by any means recognized by law.
The relief is conditional on the alert, and the mere issuing of the order by the superior is not enough. The phrase "if it is proved" also means these circumstances must be established, so it helps the employee to keep proof of his alert to his superior. The article does not specify what means recognized by law there are other than writing, and does not address the liability of the superior who issued the order.
This is linked to Article 6, which sets the penalties that may be imposed on the employee; relief here means that none of them is imposed on him for that violation once the two conditions are met. It is followed by Article 8, which explains that the end of an employee's service does not prevent disciplinary proceedings being taken or continued, except in the cases of death or total health incapacity.
Anyone facing accountability for a violation committed on his superior's order is advised to consult a lawyer specializing in administrative cases.
Practical example
The head of a department in a government body in Makkah asked the employee Noura to disburse dues without completing the required documents. Noura sent her manager a written message alerting him that this was a violation, but he insisted on execution, so she carried it out. When she is held accountable, she is relieved of the penalty under Article 7 if it is proved that she executed her superior's order after alerting him in writing.
Translated from our Arabic explanation with machine assistance. For guidance only; it does not replace advice from a lawyer on your situation.
How we write and review contentAdministrative Law lawyers: ask a specialist about your case
Describe your situation briefly and we'll suggest a lawyer who specialises in this law
Administrative Law (Board of Grievances) lawyers
Lawyers who handle this kind of case
Dr. Ali Al-Rubaie Law Office and Ittihad Al-Asr Legal Company
Al-Safwa Law Office and Legal Consultancy
Frequently asked questions about Article 7 of the Saudi Employee Discipline Law
Is an employee punished if he carries out his manager's order that is a violation?
The employee is relieved of the penalty if it is proved that he committed the violation in executing his superior's order, provided he alerted his superior to the violation in writing or by any means recognized by law.
Is it enough that the order came from the manager to be relieved of the penalty?
No. The article also requires that the employee alerted his superior to the violation in writing or by a means recognized by law.
More articles on Employee Disciplinary Violations
- Article 1
The article defines the key terms of the Employee Discipline Law, such as public employee, disciplinary violation, penalty, suspension from duty and closing an investigation.
يقصد بالألفاظ والعبارات الآتية -أينما وردت في هذا النظام- المعاني الموضحة أمام كل منها: النظام: نظام الانضباط الوظيفي. اللائحة: اللائحة التنفيذية للنظام. الوزير
- Article 5
The article provides that an employee proved to have committed a financial, administrative or conduct violation that breaches his duties is subject to the legal penalty, without prejudice to public-right or private-right claims.
كل موظف ثبت ارتكابه مخالفة مالية أو إدارية أو مسلكية مما يعد إخلالًا بواجب من واجباته الوظيفية، يطبق عليه الجزاء المنصوص عليه في النظام، وذلك دون إخلال بالحق في
- Article 14
The article allows the body employing an employee finally sentenced to a criminal penalty that does not require dismissal by operation of law to refer him to the committee if it considers his act breaches his job duties.
إذا صدر على الموظف حكم قضائي نهائي في دعوى جزائية بعقوبة غير موجبة للفصل بقوة النظام؛ فلجهة عمله إذا رأت أن ارتكابه للفعل يمثل إخلالًا بواجبات وظيفته، أن تحيل ا
The texts are reproduced from the official website of the Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers for reference; where they differ, the officially published Arabic text prevails. This content is not legal advice.

