Article 14 of the Saudi Employee Discipline Law
المادة 14 من نظام الانضباط الوظيفي
The article allows the body employing an employee finally sentenced to a criminal penalty that does not require dismissal by operation of law to refer him to the committee if it considers his act breaches his job duties.
Official text (Arabic)
This article has not been amended since the law was issued.
إذا صدر على الموظف حكم قضائي نهائي في دعوى جزائية بعقوبة غير موجبة للفصل بقوة النظام؛ فلجهة عمله إذا رأت أن ارتكابه للفعل يمثل إخلالًا بواجبات وظيفته، أن تحيل الموظف إلى اللجنة؛ لاستكمال الإجراءات اللازمة بشأنه.
This is the official Arabic wording, the only legally binding version. We do not translate the law itself; the explanation below is ours. Official source: Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers
Article 14 explained in plain English
This article addresses the relationship between a criminal judgment and disciplinary accountability. It applies when the following conditions are met:
- A final court judgment is issued against the employee.
- The judgment is in a criminal case.
- The penalty is one that does not require dismissal by operation of law, that is, it does not automatically result in dismissal.
If these conditions are met, the body employing the employee may, if it considers that his committing the act amounts to a breach of his job duties, refer him to the committee for considering violations to complete the necessary procedures regarding him.
Note that the referral is optional and not mandatory, and is conditional on the body's assessment that the act breaches job duties. A criminal judgment alone does not necessarily mean a disciplinary penalty, and the referral does not mean a penalty has been issued; rather, the proceedings before the committee begin with it. This article does not address the consequences of penalties that require dismissal by operation of law.
This article comes after Article 13, which requires the Authority to give the Ministry of Human Resources and the employee's body a copy of the final judgment issued against him, and before Article 15, which sets out the Authority's power to close the investigation or propose a penalty.
Anyone against whom a criminal judgment has been issued who fears its effect on his job is advised to consult a lawyer specializing in administrative cases.
Practical example
A final judgment was issued against an employee of a government body in Medina in a criminal case, with a penalty that does not require his dismissal by operation of law. His body considered that his act amounted to a breach of his job duties, so it referred him to the committee for considering violations to complete the procedures regarding him under Article 14.
Translated from our Arabic explanation with machine assistance. For guidance only; it does not replace advice from a lawyer on your situation.
How we write and review contentCriminal Law lawyers: ask a specialist about your case
Describe your situation briefly and we'll suggest a lawyer who specialises in this law
Criminal Law lawyers
Lawyers who handle this kind of case
Ibrahim Al Salem Law Firm
Active contributorDr. Ali Al-Rubaie Law Office and Ittihad Al-Asr Legal Company
Frequently asked questions about Article 14 of the Saudi Employee Discipline Law
Is an employee referred to discipline after a criminal judgment against him?
His employing body may refer him to the committee if the judgment is final with a penalty that does not require dismissal by operation of law, and it considers that his act amounts to a breach of his job duties.
Is referral to the committee mandatory after a criminal judgment?
No. The article makes it optional for the body if it considers that committing the act amounts to a breach of job duties.
More articles on Employee Disciplinary Violations
- Article 1
The article defines the key terms of the Employee Discipline Law, such as public employee, disciplinary violation, penalty, suspension from duty and closing an investigation.
يقصد بالألفاظ والعبارات الآتية -أينما وردت في هذا النظام- المعاني الموضحة أمام كل منها: النظام: نظام الانضباط الوظيفي. اللائحة: اللائحة التنفيذية للنظام. الوزير
- Article 5
The article provides that an employee proved to have committed a financial, administrative or conduct violation that breaches his duties is subject to the legal penalty, without prejudice to public-right or private-right claims.
كل موظف ثبت ارتكابه مخالفة مالية أو إدارية أو مسلكية مما يعد إخلالًا بواجب من واجباته الوظيفية، يطبق عليه الجزاء المنصوص عليه في النظام، وذلك دون إخلال بالحق في
- Article 7
The article relieves the employee of the penalty if it is proved that he committed the violation in executing his superior's order despite alerting his superior to it in writing or by any means recognized by law.
يعفى الموظف من الجزاء إذا ثبت أن ارتكابه المخالفة كان تنفيذًا لأمر صدر من رئيسه، بالرغم من تنبيه الموظف لرئيسه بالمخالفة كتابة أو بأي من الطرق المعتبرة نظامًا.
The texts are reproduced from the official website of the Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers for reference; where they differ, the officially published Arabic text prevails. This content is not legal advice.

