Article 13 of the Saudi Board of Grievances Law
المادة 13 من نظام ديوان المظالم · الفصل الثالث: اختصاصات المحاكم
The article lists the cases the administrative courts decide, including employee rights, annulment of administrative decisions, compensation, contracts, disciplinary cases and enforcement of foreign judgments.
Official text (Arabic)
This article has not been amended since the law was issued.
تختص المحاكم الإدارية بالفصل في الآتي:
أ ـ الدعاوى المتعلقة بالحقوق المقررة في نظم الخدمة المدنية والعسكرية والتقاعد لموظفي ومستخدمي الحكومة والأجهزة ذوات الشخصية المعنوية العامة المستقلة أو ورثتهم والمستحقين عنهم.
ب - دعاوى إلغاء القرارات الإدارية النهائية التي يقدمها ذوو الشأن، متى كان مرجع الطعن عدم الاختصاص، أو وجود عيب في الشكل، أو عيب في السبب، أو مخالفة النظم واللوائح، أو الخطأ في تطبيقها أو تأويلها، أو إساءة استعمال السلطة، بما في ذلك القرارات التأديبية، والقرارات التي تصدرها اللجان شبه القضائية والمجالس التأديبية . وكذلك القرارات التي تصدرها جمعيات النفع العام - وما في حكمها - المتصلة بنشاطاتها، ويعد في حكم القرار الإداري رفض جهة الإدارة أو امتناعها عن اتخاذ قرار كان من الواجب عليها اتخاذه طبقًا للأنظمة واللوائح.
ج - دعاوى التعويض التي يقدمها ذوو الشأن عن قرارات أو أعمال جهة الإدارة.
د - الدعاوى المتعلقة بالعقود التي تكون جهة الإدارة طرفا فيها.
هـ - الدعاوى التأديبية التي ترفعها الجهة المختصة.
و - المنازعات الإدارية الأخرى.
ز - طلبات تنفيذ الأحكام الأجنبية وأحكام المحكمين الأجنبية.
This is the official Arabic wording, the only legally binding version. We do not translate the law itself; the explanation below is ours. Official source: Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers
Article 13 explained in plain English
This is one of the most important articles of the Law, because it shows when to turn to the administrative courts of the Board of Grievances. These courts decide the following:
- Employee rights: Cases relating to rights set out in the civil service, military service and retirement laws for government employees and personnel and those of independent bodies with public legal personality, or their heirs and beneficiaries.
- Annulment of final administrative decisions: Brought by those concerned where the ground of challenge is lack of jurisdiction, a defect in form, a defect in cause, violation of laws and regulations or error in applying or interpreting them, or abuse of power. This includes disciplinary decisions, decisions of quasi-judicial committees and disciplinary boards, and decisions of public-benefit associations and the like relating to their activities. The administrative body's refusal or failure to take a decision it was required to take under the laws and regulations is treated as an administrative decision.
- Compensation: Compensation cases brought by those concerned over decisions or acts of the administrative body.
- Contracts: Cases relating to contracts to which the administrative body is a party.
- Disciplinary cases brought by the competent authority.
- Other administrative disputes.
- Requests to enforce foreign judgments and foreign arbitral awards.
Note that the annulment case is limited to "final" decisions, and that the article requires the ground of challenge to be one of the defects mentioned. Article 14 restricts this jurisdiction, barring the Board's courts from hearing cases relating to acts of sovereignty and the like mentioned there. Deadlines for filing cases and their procedures are not stated in this article.
Because the type of case and its ground affect whether it is admissible, anyone with a dispute with an administrative body is best advised to consult a lawyer specialized in administrative cases.
Practical example
Fahd applied for a license from a government body and met its legal conditions, but the body refused to issue a decision. Under this article that failure is treated as an administrative decision where the body was required to take a decision under the laws, and Fahd can bring an annulment case before the administrative court relying on one of the defects the article specifies.
Translated from our Arabic explanation with machine assistance. For guidance only; it does not replace advice from a lawyer on your situation.
How we write and review contentAdministrative Law lawyers: ask a specialist about your case
Describe your situation briefly and we'll suggest a lawyer who specialises in this law
Administrative Law (Board of Grievances) lawyers
Lawyers who handle this kind of case
Dr. Ali Al-Rubaie Law Office and Ittihad Al-Asr Legal Company
Al-Safwa Law Office and Legal Consultancy
Frequently asked questions about Article 13 of the Saudi Board of Grievances Law
Can I sue a government body that failed to issue a decision?
Yes. An administrative body's refusal or failure to take a decision it was required to take under the laws and regulations is treated as an administrative decision, so it falls within annulment cases.
What are the grounds for annulling an administrative decision?
Lack of jurisdiction, a defect in form, a defect in cause, violation of laws and regulations or error in applying or interpreting them, or abuse of power.
Do the administrative courts have jurisdiction over enforcing foreign judgments?
Yes. The article gives them jurisdiction over requests to enforce foreign judgments and foreign arbitral awards.
Are contract cases with government bodies within the jurisdiction of the Board of Grievances?
The administrative courts have jurisdiction over cases relating to contracts to which the administrative body is a party.
The texts are reproduced from the official website of the Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers for reference; where they differ, the officially published Arabic text prevails. This content is not legal advice.

