Article 38 of the Saudi Civil Service Law

المادة 38 من نظام الخدمة المدنية · الباب الثالث: أحكام عامة وانتقالية

Article 38 provides that the Civil Service Law replaces the Employees Law (Royal Decree No. M/5 dated 1/2/1391 AH) for employees originally subject to it and for those whose own systems the Employees Law supplemented, within the limits those systems provide.

Official text (Arabic)

This article has not been amended since the law was issued.

يحل هذا النظام محل نظام الموظفين الصادر بالمرسوم الملكي رقم م/5 وتاريخ 1 / 2 / 1391 هـ وذلك :

أ - بالنسبة للموظفين الخاضعين بصفة أصلية لهذا النظام.

ب - بالنسبة للموظفين الذين يعتبر النظام المذكور مكملاً للنظم التي تحكم أوضاعهم وذلك في حدود ما تنص عليه تلك النظم.

This is the official Arabic wording, the only legally binding version. We do not translate the law itself; the explanation below is ours. Official source: Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers

Article 38 explained in plain English

Translated from our Arabic explanation with machine assistance. For guidance only; it does not replace advice from a lawyer on your situation.

Administrative Law lawyers: ask a specialist about your case

Describe your situation briefly and we'll suggest a lawyer who specialises in this law

Administrative Law (Board of Grievances) lawyers

Lawyers who handle this kind of case

See all lawyers

Frequently asked questions about Article 38 of the Saudi Civil Service Law

Which law did the Civil Service Law replace?

It replaced the Employees Law issued by Royal Decree No. M/5 dated 1/2/1391 AH.

Did the Civil Service Law replace the Employees Law for all employees?

It replaced it for employees originally subject to the Civil Service Law, and for those whose own systems the Employees Law supplemented, within the limits those systems provide.

More articles on General Provisions of the Civil Service

The texts are reproduced from the official website of the Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers for reference; where they differ, the officially published Arabic text prevails. This content is not legal advice.