Skip to content

Article 78 of the Saudi Civil Aviation Law

المادة 78 من نظام الطيران المدني · الفصل الثالث: الحجز على الطائرات

The seizing party is liable for damage to the aircraft's owner or operator if they seize where it is not permitted, a sufficient guarantee was refused, or the seizure had no legitimate reason.

Official text (Arabic)

This article has not been amended since the law was issued.

يكون الحاجز مسؤولا وفقًا للأحكام والأنظمة المطبقة في المملكة عن الضرر الذي يلحق بمالك الطائرة أو مشغلها إذا أجرى توقيع الحجز على الطائرة في غير الحالات التي يجوز الحجز فيها وفقًا لأحكام هذا الفصل، أو إذا رُفضت الكفالة الكافية المقدمة من المدين ليحول دون توقيع الحجز على الطائرة أو رفعه أو إذا كان الحجز قد تم بدون سبب مشروع.

This is the official Arabic wording, the only legally binding version. We do not translate the law itself; the explanation below is ours. Official source: Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers

Article 78 explained in plain English

Practical example

Translated from our Arabic explanation with machine assistance. For guidance only; it does not replace advice from a lawyer on your situation.

How we write and review content

Civil Litigation & Compensation lawyers: ask a specialist about your case

Describe your situation briefly and we'll suggest a lawyer who specialises in this law

Civil Litigation & Compensation lawyers

Lawyers who handle this kind of case

Dr. Ali Al-Rubaie Law Office and Ittihad Al-Asr Legal Company

Riyadh — العليا Consultation from SAR 450
Labour & Employment LawCriminal LawAdministrative LawCivil Litigation & Compensation+4

Abdullah Al-Saleh Law Office for Law and Legal Consultancy

Riyadh
Labour & Employment LawCivil Litigation & CompensationCommercial & Corporate LawGeneral Practice
See all lawyers

Frequently asked questions about Article 78 of the Saudi Civil Aviation Law

Am I entitled to compensation if my aircraft was seized without right?

The seizing party is liable for the damage to the owner or operator if the seizure was made in cases where it is not permitted or without a legitimate reason, under the applicable laws.

What if the creditor refuses the guarantee I offered?

If the guarantee offered was sufficient and was refused, the seizing party is liable for the resulting damage.

How is compensation for a wrongful seizure assessed?

The article does not set the method of assessment; it refers to the provisions and laws applicable in the Kingdom.

More articles on Attaching Aircraft

The texts are reproduced from the official website of the Bureau of Experts at the Council of Ministers for reference; where they differ, the officially published Arabic text prevails. This content is not legal advice.